Tag Archives: Immigration Rules

Pending Case NA (C-115/15): Four Questions For CJEU

European Union (EU) law can be potent stuff; its spectacularly emollient effects are totally life-changing for beneficiaries. Conversely, the abrasive national rules are fraught with treachery and only the fit survive. Impossible things are possible for illegal entrants under the regulations … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, CFR, Citizens Directive, CJEU, ECHR, European Union, Human Rights, Immigration Rules, Karachi, Pakistan, Permanent Residence | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Student Loans: Settlement Criterion Declared Unlawful

R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 (29 July 2015) Soaring costs, rampant hostility towards foreigners and rigid rules have made the UK an unattractive place to live and study. But should settlement … Continue reading

Posted in Appendix FM, Article 14, Article 8, ECHR, Education, Human Rights Act, Immigration Rules, Lady Hale, Settlement, Students, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Stringency and Sensibility under Appendix FM

R (Agyarko & Ors) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWCA Civ 440 (06 May 2015) This is the sequel to the SS (Congo) case analysed in the last post. To do with leave to remain … Continue reading

Posted in Appendix FM, Article 8, Children, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Proportionality, Spouses | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

‘Evidential Flexibility’ in Supreme Court

Imagine that you made a mistake in your immigration application but were later able to fix the problem because of the “evidential flexibility” policy. This issue has vexed both litigants and the courts for quite some time now. On appeal … Continue reading

Posted in Court of Appeal, Immigration Rules, India, PBS, s 19 UKBA 2007, Students, Tier 4, Tribunals | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Paragraph 353 is the Gateway to Human Rights Appeals

R (Waqar) v SSHD (statutory appeals/paragraph 353) (IJR) [2015] UKUT 169 (IAC) (25 March 2015) This case exposes the conflict inherent in the system of appeals. Waqar argued that paragraph 353 of the Immigration Rules had been subsumed within the … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Crime, Deportation, ECHR, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

HC 1116 and ‘Abuse’ of Asylum by Syrians

Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules HC 1116 was immediately condemned as “sickening”. Undoubtedly, the formula of a well-founded fear of persecution is wide open to abuse. However, in light of all the carnage that we have witnessed over the … Continue reading

Posted in Asylum, Immigration Rules, Pakistan, Persecution, Syria, Terrorism, Visitors | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Court of Appeal: American Visitor’s Appeal Allowed

PG (USA) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWCA Civ 118 (26 February 2015) In this case, Elias and Fulford LJJ, Dame Janet Smith allowed Phyllis Gain’s appeal and remitted the matter to the Upper Tribunal … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Court of Appeal, Immigration Rules, PBS, Proportionality, Tier 2, Visitors | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment