Tag Archives: Article 8

Brexit and the UK’s future immigration system

The spectre of crashing out of the EU without a deal is sending jitters across the UK. Events have clearly shown that holding a snap poll on immigration failed to do justice to the true merits of EU membership. Last … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Brexit, Citizens Directive, CJEU, ECHR, European Union, Immigration Rules, Politics, Tier 1, Tier 2, UKSC, Windrush, Working | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Court of Appeal holds that a ‘rolling review’ is acceptable

R (Spahiu) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2604 (28 November 2018) Adding to the vast expanse of technical judicial review litigation, this judgment concerns a protracted dispute between a failed asylum-seeker and the Home … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Asylum, Court of Appeal, Culture, ECHR, Judicial Review, Removals, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New Perspectives on Paragraph 322(5) and ILR

R (Khan) v SSHD (Dishonesty, Tax Return, Paragraph 322(5)) [2018] UKUT 384 (IAC) (3 May 2018) Migrants in the defunct Tier 1 (General) category used to be a viable source of highly skilled workers for the UK. Since the route … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, False Statements and Misrepresentations, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Misconduct, Pakistan, Paragraph 322(5), Tier 1, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Article 8 and Private Life: Supreme Court Confirms Bright-line Interpretation of ‘Precarious’ in Section 117B(5) of NIAA 2002

Rhuppiah v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] UKSC 58 (14 November 2018) In interpreting the meaning of “precarious” in section 117B(5) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (as amended), whereby little weight should be given to … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Court of Appeal, ECHR, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Precariousness, Proportionality, Settlement, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Seven Year Rule: Child-Centred Decision By Supreme Court

KO (Nigeria) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2018] UKSC 53 (24 October 2018) The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed these appeals. But thankfully Lord Carnwath’s meticulous judgment clarified wide-ranging misconceptions in the courts below regarding … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Automatic Deportation, Children, Court of Appeal, Deception, ECHR, Families, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Proportionality, Public Interest, Removals, s 55 BCIA, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Article 8 and Paposhvili: Guidance in GS (India) is Correct

SL (St Lucia) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 1894 (07 August 2018) The important judgment in Paposhvili v Belgium [2016] ECHR 1113 caused quite a stir when it was delivered. However, its effects … Continue reading

Posted in Article 3, Article 8, Court of Appeal, Immigration Rules, Medical Cases, Precariousness, Proportionality, Public Interest, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Deprivation of Citizenship: Unnecessary to Conduct a Proleptic Analysis of Deportation

Aziz & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 1884 (08 August 2018) Abdul Aziz, Abdul Rauf and Adil Khan – the appellants – were convicted in 2012 of the grooming, sexual exploitation and trafficking … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Children, Citizenship and Nationality, Crime, Deportation, Deprivation of Citizenship, ECHR, Pakistan | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment