Tag Archives: Immigration Act 1971

EU Settlement Scheme is unlawful

Posted on January 7, 2023 by Asad Ali Khan, BA, MSc, MA, LL.B (Hons), LL.M

R (On the Application of The Independent Monitoring Authority for the Citizens’ Rights Agreements) v SSHD [2022] EWHC 3274 (Admin) (21 December 2022) The EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) is unlawful because it contravenes the Withdrawal Agreement negotiated between the UK … Continue reading →

Posted in Appendix EU, Brexit, CJEU, European Union, EUSS, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Permanent Residence, Withdrawal Agreement | Tagged Appendix EU, Brexit, EUSS, Immigration Act 1971, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Overstaying | Leave a comment

Search for:
INSTRUCT ME
Subscribe for free

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address:

Join 1,805 other subscribers
- View asadakhan.104’s profile on Facebook
- View khanasada’s profile on Twitter
- View id=52295772&trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile’s profile on LinkedIn
- View Asad Khan’s profile on YouTube
Archives
Archives
Categories
Categories
Calendar
May 2024

M T W T F S S

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

27 28 29 30 31

« Apr
UKVI News and Updates
- Guidance: Medical appointments outside the detention estate
- Guidance: Register of licensed sponsors: workers
- Guidance: Register of licensed sponsors: students
- Guidance: India: tuberculosis test clinics for a UK visa
- Form: Windrush Compensation Scheme: claim forms and guidance
- Guidance: Tuberculosis testing in Iran
- Guidance: Ecuador: tuberculosis test clinics for a UK visa
- Transparency data: Ukraine Visa Schemes: visa data
- Guidance: Sponsor guidance appendix D: keeping records for sponsorship
- Guidance: Sponsor an International Agreement worker
Popular Tags
- 2004/38/EC
- Adoption
- Africa
- AP (Russia)
- Appeals
- Appendix FM
- Article 8
- Asylum
- Bangladesh
- BNA 1981
- Brexit
- British Citizenship
- British Nationality
- British Overseas Citizens
- Business
- Case Law
- Child Abduction
- Children
- Constitution
- Court of Appeal
- Criminal Offences
- Deception
- Dependants
- Detention
- DIsclosure
- Dual Nationality
- Dublin II
- ECHR
- Economy
- Entrepreneurs
- Entry Clearance
- European Union
- EUSS
- Fairness
- False Representations
- Fees
- Free Movement
- Habitual Residence
- Hague Convention
- Human Rights
- Human Trafficking
- ILR
- Immigration
- Immigration Cap
- Immigration Rules
- India
- Investors
- Iran
- Judicial Review
- Kenya
- Long Residence
- Marriage
- Migrant Workers
- Nigeria
- Overseas Workers
- Pakistan
- Pankina
- Part5A NIAA
- Persecution
- Points Based System
- Refugee Convention
- Removals
- Rule of law
- Russia
- Settlement
- SIAC
- Spouses
- Strasbourg
- Students
- Terrorism
- Tribunals
- UKBA
- UK Supreme Court
- Upper Tribunal
- Zambrano
Global Corporate Law
- Key Features of the Singapore Convention on Mediation
- What is the test for a ‘one man company’?
- LIBOR: The Final Nail in the Coffin?
- Banking and Misconduct: A Critique of the Cure of Culture
- Court of Appeal Opens the Door to LIBOR and Benchmark Misrepresentation Claims
- Habib Bank Expelled From New York
- Supreme Court: Equity’s Darling and Guidance on Enforceability of Trusts where the Institution is Unknown
- Conduct Costs on the Rise (2012-2016): No End in Sight
- Supreme Court Clarifies the Law on Security and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards
- FSMA and Third Party Rights: Victory for FCA in Supreme Court
Recent Posts
- False representations made in pending application don’t ‘simply disappear’ by varying it to an ILR application
- Home Office wins in Supreme Court against Belarusian man with “limbo” status
- Somali ILR holder stranded in Africa for 16 years succeeds in Cart judicial review in Court of Appeal
- Woman resident in the UK for 39 years loses deportation battle
- Failure to conduct statistical data monitoring on provision of accommodation to vulnerable PNMAS breaches PSED
- Court of Appeal disapproves of tribunal’s decision in Capparelli
- HC 590: Changes to MIR, Skilled Worker and other rules
- Appendix FM leave knocks out Zambrano right of residence
- Court of Appeal rejects invitation to treat EUSS family permit application as an EEA permit application
- Test of dishonesty in Ivey applies to deprivation decisions
Pages
- Case Law
- Editor
- Expert Reports
- Immigration Work
- Khan & Co Barristers
- Pakistan International Law
- Legal Advice
Search for:
Top Posts
- Upper Tribunal: Tanveer Ahmed remains good law
- Court of Appeal: Substance not form grounds a family life
- False representations made in pending application don’t ‘simply disappear’ by varying it to an ILR application
- Pakistan and the Child Abduction Convention
- Poorly drafted long residence rules lead to avoidable litigation
- Home Office is failing potential victims of human trafficking
- Court of Appeal rejects fresh evidence in TOEIC case
- Court of Appeal: FTT failed to apply Iran country guidance to Kurdish asylum seeker’s case
- The Court of Appeal on Substantive and Procedural Fairness
- Court of Appeal: De facto adoption rules seem to be irrational
Immigration News
- £30,000 raised for Wirral ‘local legend’ denied UK citizenship
- Fears of new Windrush as thousands of UK immigrants face ‘cliff edge’ visa change
- British asylum housing tycoon breaks into Sunday Times rich list
- The Tories' war on foreign students isn’t for the good of the country – it's about saving their own skins | Polly Toynbee
- What are Labour’s six pledges and how likely is their success?
- Refused asylum seekers also at risk of being sent to Rwanda, says Home Office
- The UK’s broken refugee policy is delivering scared children into the hands of people smugglers | Alf Dubs
- Home Office department processing Rwanda deportations told to cut jobs
- Keir Starmer averts row with union leaders as Labour reiterates ‘full commitment’ to new deal for working people – as it happened
- People on Bibby Stockholm treated like ‘cattle’, former workers say
Disclaimer

The analysis and commentary on the law on this weblog is provided free of charge for information purposes only. All reasonable steps are taken to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date at the date each item is published, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by its author. The pages, information, and commentary do not, and are not intended to, amount to providing legal advice to any person on any case or matter. You are strongly advised to obtain case specific, personal advice from a qualified lawyer about your case(s) or matter(s) and not to rely on the information or comments on this site for the purposes of your legal situation(s). This site is not associated with the UK Government or any other government for that matter. Please do not misconstrue anything herein to be connected to the Home Office or any other third party.
Top Posts & Pages
- Upper Tribunal: Tanveer Ahmed remains good law
- Court of Appeal: Substance not form grounds a family life
- False representations made in pending application don’t ‘simply disappear’ by varying it to an ILR application
- Pakistan and the Child Abduction Convention
- Poorly drafted long residence rules lead to avoidable litigation
- Home Office is failing potential victims of human trafficking
- Court of Appeal rejects fresh evidence in TOEIC case
- Court of Appeal: FTT failed to apply Iran country guidance to Kurdish asylum seeker’s case
- The Court of Appeal on Substantive and Procedural Fairness
- Court of Appeal: De facto adoption rules seem to be irrational