Tag Archives: Tribunals

What is the Meaning of ‘Precarious’ in Section 117B(5) of the NIAA 2002?

Having already heard a string of appeals relating to the meaning of “reasonable” in section 117B(6) and the meaning of “unduly harsh” in section 117C(5) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (as amended), recently in Rhuppiah the Supreme Court … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Court of Appeal, ECHR, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Precariousness, Proportionality, Public Interest, Settlement, Students, Tier 2, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Ending the Kumar Arrangements in Judicial Review

R (KA & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Ending of Kumar Arrangements) [2018] UKUT 201 (IAC) (13 June 2018) At times the courts take a lenient approach to governmental ineptitude and judges tend to throw a … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Children, Costs, Court of Appeal, ECHR, Immigration Rules, Judges, Judicial Review, Misconduct, Rule of law, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tier 1 (General): Perspectives on Paragraph 322(5) and ILR

Cases in the Tier 1 (General) category present an outrage because we would not really expect highly skilled migrants to be punished for being honest by paying their taxes. Similarly, we would also not expect migrants who add value to … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Cases, ECHR, False Statements and Misrepresentations, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Misconduct, Pakistan, Paragraph 322(5), PBS, Post Study Work, Proportionality, Public Interest, Tier 1, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Free Movement: Home Office Softens its Stance on Retained Rights of Residence

Baigazieva v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 1088 (20 April 2018) In this case the Home Office extraordinarily conceded that for a third country national to retain residence rights in the UK under article 13(2)(a) … Continue reading

Posted in Children, Citizens Directive, CJEU, Court of Appeal, Domestic Violence, European Union, Free Movement, OFMs, Pakistan, Permanent Residence, Spouses | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Restricted Leave: Only Rare Cases are Suitable for Settlement

Babar v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 329 (01 March 2018) Tanvir Babar used to be a Pakistani policeman. He worked in law enforcement for 17 years and was in charge of a squad of … Continue reading

Posted in Appendix FM, Article 3, Article 8, Asylum, ECHR, False Statements, Immigration Rules, Integration, Pakistan, Proportionality, Public Interest, Refugee Convention, RLR, Settlement | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Article 8 After Agyarko: The Correct Approach

TZ (Pakistan) and PG (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 1109 (17 May 2018) These appeals were heard after the Supreme Court’s decision in R (Agyarko) [2017] UKSC 11 (see here) which made it … Continue reading

Posted in Appendix FM, Article 8, Court of Appeal, ECHR, Families, Human Rights Act, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, India, Pakistan, Proportionality, Public Interest, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Undue Harshness and the Public Interest in Deportation

IT (Jamaica) involves the important issue of the weight to be given to the public interest when considering whether a refusal to revoke a deportation order against a foreign criminal would be “unduly harsh” on his British citizen child within the … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Automatic Deportation, Children, ECHR, European Union, Families, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Jamaica, Proportionality, Public Interest, s 55 BCIA, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment