Author Archives: mkp

About mkp

Advocate High Courts of Pakistan

Case Preview: Johnson v SSHD

Throwing up blazing issues of historic injustice and denial of citizenship at birth, this jamming case is hot stuff. Earlier, the Court of Appeal overturned the judgment of Dingemans J and held that no violation of article 14 of the … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Automatic Deportation, Citizenship and Nationality, Court of Appeal, Historic Injustice, Illegitimacy, Jamaica, UKBA 2007, UKSC | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Sahrawi Asylum Seeker’s Detention Upheld

R (ML (Morocco)) v SSHD [2016] EWHC 2177 (Admin) (31 August 2016) The Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons 1954 expresses quite “profound concern” for stateless persons not protected by the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees … Continue reading

Posted in Africa, Article 5, Asylum, Crime, Detention, Statelessness | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

‘Integration’ Calls for a Broad Evaluative Judgment

Secretary of State for the Home Department v Kamara [2016] EWCA Civ 813 (11 August 2016) It is nearly impossible to find an immigration judgment at the Court of Appeal level that does not mention any case law at all. … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Court of Appeal, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Public Interest, Settlement, UKBA 2007 | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Children and the Seven Year Itch

R (MA (Pakistan) & Ors) v UTIAC & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 705 (07 July 2016) The divergence of views on what is or is not important about the 7-year rule means that nothing really makes sense anymore. Unsurprisingly, there … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Children, Court of Appeal, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Proportionality, Public Interest, Removals | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Article 8 and Precariousness: Appendix FM in Supreme Court

These days the Immigration Rules are full of riddles. Applying a gloss on article 8 of the ECHR, wide-ranging rubric under the existing rules incorporates high legal tests such as “insurmountable obstacles”, “exceptional circumstances”, “compelling circumstances” and “exceptionality”. Such phrases dictate the … Continue reading

Posted in Appendix FM, Article 8, Blogging, ECHR, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Proportionality, Spouses, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Extremely Deplorable CJEU Ruling on Domestic Violence

SSHD v NA (Pakistan) [2016] EUECJ C-115/15, EU:C:2016:487 (30 June 2016) As pointed out by Guild, Peers and Tomkin in The EU Citizenship Directive: A Commentary (2014), Directive 2004/38/EC “has proven to be a fertile ground for litigation, generating increasing, … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, CFR, Citizens Directive, CJEU, Domestic Violence, Employment, Proportionality, Women | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reference by Supreme Court to CJEU: Does Enhanced Protection Depend on Permanent Residence?

Secretary of State for the Home Department v Franco Vomero (Italy) [2016] UKSC 49 (27 July 2016) In analysing the future role of the courts in the post-Brexit legal landscape, Christina Lienen predicts a rise in EU law cases because … Continue reading

Posted in Brexit, Cases, Citizens Directive, Citizenship and Nationality, CJEU, Court of Appeal, Deportation, Permanent Residence, Proportionality, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment