Tag Archives: Judicial Review

The “good character” requirement for Windrush naturalisation applicants was unlawful

R (Howard, Deceased) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 1023 (Admin) (23 April 2021)  Mr Justice Swift held in these proceedings that the government’s decision in early May 2018 to continue to apply the existing good … Continue reading

Posted in Article 14, Article 8, ECHR, ECtHR, Historic Injustice, Hostile Environment, Immigration Act 2014, Jamaica, Judicial Review, Windrush | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Procedural fairness: ECO must put suspicions of dishonesty to applicant before refusal says Court of Appeal

R (Wahid) v Entry Clearance Officer [2021] EWCA Civ 346 (25 February 2021)  Following the approach in Balajigari v SSHD [2019] EWCA Civ 673 (discussed here), the Court of Appeal has held that it is arguable that procedural fairness required … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Appendix V, Costs, Court of Appeal, Entry Clearance, False Statements and Misrepresentations, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Pakistan, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Appendix FM: SSHD cannot push parent into partner route

R (Khattak) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (“eligible to apply” – LTR – “partner”) [2021] UKUT 63 (IAC) (23 February 2021 Granting judicial review, the UT has held that an applicant is “eligible to apply for leave to … Continue reading

Posted in Appendix FM, Article 8, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Pakistan, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Failure to provide legal aid advice to immigration detainees in prison is unlawful

R (SM) v Bail for Immigration Detainees [2021] EWHC 418 (Admin) (25 February 2021) In these proceedings, Swift J held that the failure to give immigration detainees held in prison access to publicly funded legal advice to an extent equivalent … Continue reading

Posted in Access to Justice, Article 14, Article 2, Article 3, Article 5, Article 8, Asylum, Bail, Detention, IRCs, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Shamima Begum: SSHD strikes back in Supreme Court 

R (Begum) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission & Anor [2021] UKSC 7 (26 February 2021)  Ms Shamima Begum was born and raised in the UK. She was a British citizen at birth and at age 15 she travelled to Syria … Continue reading

Posted in Access to Justice, Appeals, Article 2, Article 3, Article 6, Citizenship and Nationality, Court of Appeal, Deprivation of Citizenship, ECHR, Entry Clearance, Human Rights Act, Human Trafficking, Iraq, ISIS/ISIL, Judicial Review, Statelessness, Syria, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Court of Appeal: £1,012 citizenship fee for children is unlawful

R (Project for the Registration of Children As British Citizens & Anor) v SSHD [2021] EWCA Civ 193 (18 February 2021)  The Court of Appeal has held that the SSHD failed to consider the best interests of children under section … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Children, Citizenship and Nationality, Court of Appeal, Immigration Act 2014, Judicial Review, s 55 BCIA, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

New evidence must satisfy Ladd v Marshall to justify departure from FTT decision on refugee status

R (Al-Siri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 113 (08 February 2021) The Court of Appeal dismissed the government’s appeal against the judgment of Richard Clayton QC where he had quashed the decision of the … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 3, Asylum, Court of Appeal, ECHR, Egypt, Islam, Judicial Review, Refugee Convention, Terrorism | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Procedural fairness fails entrepreneur in Court of Appeal

R (Taj) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 19 (20 January 2021)  Genuineness of intention is a key part of obtaining a visa to the UK. This appeal related to the closed (in March 2019) Tier … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Court of Appeal, Fairness, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Pakistan, PBS, Tier 1, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Proof, expert evidence and credibility in trafficking cases

MN v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 1746 (21 December 2020)  The Court of Appeal has decided that the two-stage procedure provided for by the National Referral Mechanism (NRM) to determine whether a person is … Continue reading

Posted in Article 4, Council of Europe, Court of Appeal, ECAT, ECHR, European Union, Expert Evidence, Female Genital Mutilation, Forced marriage, Human Trafficking, Judicial Review, Nigeria, Slavery, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

An unlawful lacuna in policy is harming victims of trafficking

EOG (Anonymity Order Made) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWHC 3310 (Admin) (03 December 2020) Mostyn J has held that an unlawful lacuna in the government’s existing policy concerning the leave to remain of potential trafficking … Continue reading

Posted in Article 14, Article 3, ECAT, ECHR, Hostile Environment, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Home Office is failing potential victims of human trafficking

DA & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWHC 3080 (Admin) (13 November 2020)  In judicial review proceedings brought by an Eritrean and two Sudanese nationals who claimed to be victims of human trafficking, Fordham J held that … Continue reading

Posted in Access to Justice, Arrivals, Article 3, Asylum, Brexit, Detention, Eritrea, Human Trafficking, Judicial Review, Libya, Modern Slavery, Removals, Sudan | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Court of Appeal clarifies giving of curtailment notices

R (Alam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 1527 (16 November 2020)  The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals of Mr Masud Alam and Mr Masud Rana who had both appealed against the refusal of … Continue reading

Posted in Bangladesh, Court of Appeal, Curtailment, Judicial Review, Notices, Tier 4, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Procedural fairness fails skilled migrant in Court of Appeal

R (Topadar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 1525 The uncertain outcome in the Supreme Court in R (Pathan) v SSHD [2020] UKSC 41, discussed here, was swiftly put to the test in the case … Continue reading

Posted in Appendix Skilled Worker, Article 8, Bank Accounts, Court of Appeal, Employment, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, PBS, Procedural Fairness, Tier 2, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Court of Appeal refuses relief in “bad” paragraph 322(5) cases

R (Baldha & Anor) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 1494 (10 November 2020)  In two tax discrepancy matters with some similarities, sitting alone Hickinbottom LJ decided to refuse permission to amend and permission to appeal in … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Costs, Court of Appeal, Immigration Rules, India, Judicial Review, Overstaying, Paragraph 322(5), PBS, Settlement, Tax, Tier 1, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Supreme Court: Failure to promptly notify migrant of revocation of sponsor’s licence breached duty of procedural fairness

R (Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 41 (23 October 2020)  This case turned on the issue whether notice to an applicant of revocation of a sponsor’s licence in respect of his Tier 2 (General) … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Court of Appeal, ECHR, Employment, Immigration Rules, India, Judicial Review, Overstaying, PBS, Students, Tier 2, UKSC, Working | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lahore High Court ruling on Pakistan and Child Abduction

In Abid Hussain (Petitioner) v Rukhsana Munir and others (Respondents) 2020 YLR 1533 Lahore, Miss Aalia Neelum J directed Pakistan’s police authorities to produce two Dutch girls of Pakistani origin, who had been abducted by their own mother and then taken … Continue reading

Posted in Child Abduction, Children, Citizenship and Nationality, Divorce, Families, Family Court, Habitual Residence, Hague Convention, Judicial Review, Lahore High Court, Netherlands, Pakistan | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Syria returnee’s proceedings do not breach right to fair trial

QX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWHC 2508 (Admin) (21 September 2020) “QX” the claimant for judicial review was a British jihadi who had spent time in Syria. He aligned himself with a group that was … Continue reading

Posted in Article 6, Article 8, Disclosure, ECHR, High Court, ISIS/ISIL, Islam, Judicial Review, Politics, Syria, Terrorism | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Home Office loses appeal in Ugandan LGBT asylum case

PN (Uganda), R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 1213 (28 September 2020)  The Court of Appeal has dismissed the SSHD’s appeal against Lewis J’s decision in PN v SSHD [2019] … Continue reading

Posted in Access to Justice, Article 3, Asylum, Court of Appeal, ECHR, Human Trafficking, Judicial Review, Law Society, Persecution, Refugee Convention, Removals, Tribunals, UKSC, Yarl's Wood IRC | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Principles and practice of adoption law in Pakistan

Pakistan is not party to the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption 1993 and adopting a child in Pakistan is a long, difficult, and legally-complex process. Observably, the Guardians and Wards Act 1890 governs … Continue reading

Posted in Adoption, Adoption Convention, Cases, Children, Habitual Residence, Human Trafficking, International Law, Karachi, Pakistan, United States | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Court of Appeal refuses to reopen paragraph 322(5) appeal

R (Akram) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 1072 (12 August 2020) The Court of Appeal has refused to reopen the appeal of a Pakistani Tier 1 (General) Migrant who had been refused indefinite leave … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Court of Appeal, Hostile Environment, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Pakistan, Paragraph 322(5), PBS, Settlement, Tier 1, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment