Tag Archives: Judicial Review

Court of Appeal interprets section 117D(2) of the NIAA 2002

Mahmood, R (on the application of) v Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) & Ors [2020] EWCA Civ 717 (05 June 2020) The Court of Appeal has held that when determining whether a person had been convicted of an offence … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Automatic Deportation, Court of Appeal, Deportation, ECHR, Immigration Act 2014, Judicial Review, Settlement, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Court of Appeal confirms £1 flat rate of pay in IRCs is lawful 

Badmus & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 657 (20 May 2020) Sir Terence Etherton MR and Hickinbottom and Simler LJJ have determined in these proceedings that the … Continue reading

Posted in Article 14, Article 4, Article 8, Court of Appeal, Deportation, Detention, ECHR, Employment, IRCs, Judicial Review, Windrush | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

NRPF regime breaches Article 3 of the ECHR and is unlawful

R (W, A Child By His Litigation Friend J) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2020] EWHC 1299 (Admin) (21 May 2020) The “no recourse to public funds” or “NRPF” condition produces the effect of … Continue reading

Posted in Article 3, Children, COVID-19, ECHR, Families, Fees, Hostile Environment, Human Rights Act, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Act 2016, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, NRPF, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Upper Tribunal: Policy on fee waivers is unlawful 

In R (otao Dzineku-Liggison) v SSHD [JR/2249/2019], the UT held that the Home Office’s policy on fee waivers, namely the Fee Waiver: Human Rights-based and other specified applications, version 3.0 (dated 4 January 2019), is unlawful. UTJ Blundell took the … Continue reading

Posted in Article 3, Article 8, Cases, Children, ECHR, Families, Fees, Hostile Environment, Human Rights Act, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Removals, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Domestic violence claim is not a human rights claim 

MY (refusal of human rights claim: Pakistan) [2020] UKUT 89 (IAC) (27 February 2020)  This decision brings further detriment to applicants relying on the domestic violence rules to obtain leave to remain. The result is that the Home Office can … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Appendix FM, Article 3, Article 8, COVID-19, Domestic Violence, ECHR, Hostile Environment, Human Rights Act, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Pakistan, Settlement, Spouses, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

MLA without death penalty assurance breaches the DPA 

Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 10 (25 March 2020)  This judgment his about a number of things. It is about mutual legal assistance (MLA), it is about the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria/Levant … Continue reading

Posted in Article 2, Cases, COVID-19, CPS, Crime, Deportation, ECHR, Human Rights Act, Judicial Review, Politics, Terrorism, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

False imprisonment: Supreme Court overrules Draga

DN (Rwanda), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 7 (26 February 2020)  In this important judgment, the Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeal’s decision in Draga [2012] EWCA Civ 842 … Continue reading

Posted in Access to Justice, Africa, Appeals, Article 5, Asylum, Deportation, Detention, ECHR, Enforcement, Judicial Review, Public Interest, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Supreme Court refuses to take “retrograde step” on the tort of false imprisonment

R (Jalloh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 4 (12 February 2020)  The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the government’s appeal in Jalloh (formerly Jollah) concerning the law on damages for the tort of false imprisonment. The … Continue reading

Posted in Article 5, Asylum, Court of Appeal, Curfew, Detention, ECHR, Human Rights, Judicial Review, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Registration fees for British citizenship breach section 55 duty

R (PRCBC & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWHC 3536 (Admin) (19 December 2019)  The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens (“PRCBC”), and two child claimants “O” and “A” brought judicial review proceedings against … Continue reading

Posted in Access to Justice, Article 14, Article 8, Children, ECHR, Human Rights Act, Judicial Review, Proportionality, Settlement, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Upper Tribunal demands adherence to proper standards of appellate advocacy

Das (paragraph 276B – s3C – application validity) Bangladesh [2019] UKUT 354 (IAC) (8 October 2019)  This case makes a variety of points about the validity of immigration applications, the enjoyment of statutorily extended leave under section 3C of the … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Bangladesh, ECHR, Immigration Rules, Judges, Judicial Review, Notices, PBS, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Brexit: Analysis of Miller and Cherry in Supreme Court

R (Miller/Cherry) v The Prime Minister [2019] UKSC 41 (24 September 2019)  These proceedings concerned a “one-off” issue arising in circumstances unseen in history and unlikely to arise again. The Supreme Court was cautious to emphasise at the outset that these … Continue reading

Posted in Brexit, Cases, Court of Appeal, European Union, False Statements and Misrepresentations, Judges, Judicial Review, Lady Hale, Miller, Parliament, Politics, Prerogative, Rule of law, Sedley LJ, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Does EIG satisfy Dublin III on detaining asylum seekers? 

In Hemmati & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 2122, the Court of Appeal held by a majority that the detention of five asylum seekers pending removal to other Member States had been unlawful because neither the Enforcement Instructions and Guidance Chapter 55 … Continue reading

Posted in Article 5, Asylum, CFR, CJEU, Court of Appeal, Detention, ECHR, European Union, Judicial Review, Lady Hale, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Should the UK provide MLA to the US for the death penalty? 

In the Divisional Court, the mother of the accused ISIS terrorist Shafee El Sheikh, Maha El Gizouli failed in her challenge against the Home Secretary’s decision to provide mutual legal assistance (MLA) to the US without requiring an assurance that … Continue reading

Posted in Article 3, Article 8, CFR, Citizenship and Nationality, Court of Appeal, ECHR, European Union, Human Rights Act, Judicial Review, Syria, Terrorism, UKSC, United States | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

High Court orders asylum-seeker’s return to pursue appeal 

PN (Uganda) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWHC 1616 (Admin) (24 June 2019) In these judicial review proceedings, brought by “PN”, Lewis J held that the dismissal of Ugandan woman’s appeal against the refusal of … Continue reading

Posted in Africa, Article 3, Article 8, Asylum, Court of Appeal, Dyson JSC/MR, High Court, Judicial Review, Persecution, Refugee Convention, Tribunals, Uganda, Women, Yarl's Wood IRC | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tier 2 (General) and ‘genuine vacancy’: Court of Appeal holds that irrational PBS refusal should be quashed 

R (Suny) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 1019 (19 June 2019) Irwin and Underhill LJJ recently held that the refusal of leave to remain under Tier 2 (General) to a Bangladeshi migrant could … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Court of Appeal, Economy, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, PBS, Tier 2, UKSC, Working | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Court of Appeal holds that a ‘director’s loan’ does not have a specialist meaning in Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) applications

R (Sajjad) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 720 (17 April 2019) In a Pakistani businessman’s appeal against the dismissal of his application for judicial review against the refusal of his application for further leave … Continue reading

Posted in Business, Companies Act 2006, Court of Appeal, Entrepreneurs, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Pakistan, PBS, Tier 1, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Paragraph 322(5) and Tier 1 (General): Home Office policy of refusing ILR in earnings discrepancy cases is ‘legally flawed’

Balajigari v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 673 (16 April 2019) In a complex judgment, the Court of Appeal has held that the ongoing use of paragraph 322(5) of the Immigration Rules in the cases … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Court of Appeal, ECHR, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Paragraph 322(5), PBS, Settlement, Tier 1, Tribunals, UKSC, Windrush | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Fraud and revocation of ILR: Court of Appeal unlocks the door to the finality of unappealed tribunal decisions

Ullah v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 550 (03 April 2019) The Court of Appeal recently dismissed a Pakistani immigrant’s appeal against the refusal of his judicial review claim challenging the decision to cancel … Continue reading

Posted in Court of Appeal, Entry Clearance, False Statements and Misrepresentations, Immigration Act 2014, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Pakistan, Proportionality, Settlement, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

‘Standoff’ in enforcement: Once given, an oral decision stands

PAA (First-tier Tribunal: Oral decision – written reasons) [2019] UKUT 13 (IAC) (10 January 2019) Arguably, nothing is more exhilarating in tribunal proceedings than a judge allowing your client’s appeal in an oral decision by uttering “I will allow this appeal”. But … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Asylum, Children, Enforcement, Inherent Jurisdiction, Iraq, Judicial Review, Legitimate Expectation, Tribunals | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

No death penalty assurance is necessary for ISIS ‘Beatles’

R (El Gizouli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWHC 60 (Admin) (18 January 2019) In a rolled-up hearing, Lord Burnett LCJ and Garnham J granted permission for judicial review in these proceedings but their Lordships dismissed … Continue reading

Posted in Article 3, Article 8, CFR, ECHR, Human Rights Act, International Law, Iran, Judicial Review, Politics, Rule of law, Terrorism, UKSC | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment