Tag Archives: UK Supreme Court

TN & MA (Afghanistan): Is JR an Effective Remedy for UASCs?

Like the case of AA (Afghanistan), the cases of TN and MA (Afghanistan) (AP) (Appellants) UKSC 2014/0047 also involve the Reception Directive and regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 which impose on the Home Office the … Continue reading

Posted in Afghan War, Asylum, CFR, Children, CJEU, ECHR, European Union, Judicial Review | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

AA (Afghanistan): What is the Scope of the Tracing Duty?

The Supreme Court looks set to hear a trio of Afghan asylum cases next week. The fact that AA (Afghanistan) (Appellant) UKSC 2014/0081 and TN and MA (Afghanistan) (AP) (Appellants) UKSC 2014/0047 involve children does not detract from the truly … Continue reading

Posted in Afghan War, Asylum, Children, CJEU, Judicial Review, s 55 BCIA | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Under Zoumbas, Tribunal Cases Can’t Contradict Nagre

Javed & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 390 (Admin) (20 February 2015) This judicial review claim concerned a six member Pakistani family. Together with his wife, two sons and two daughters, Mr Javed arrived … Continue reading

Posted in Appendix FM, Article 8, Immigration Rules, Pakistan | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Alvi Argument Betrays Work Permit Holder

R (Memon) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 205 (Admin) (06 February 2015) The Memons are a fiercely business-minded people who originate in the Sindh province of Pakistan and the Indian state of Gujarat. The … Continue reading

Posted in Alvi, Cases, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Pakistan, Work Permits | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Presidential Guidance on Dublin Cases

R (Weldegaber) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Dublin Returns – Italy) IJR [2015] UKUT 70 (IAC) (12 Feb 2015) Yosief Weldegaber, the applicant for judicial review was a 31-year old Eritrean national. His removal was stayed by … Continue reading

Posted in Article 3, Asylum, CFR, Human Rights Act | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pre-entry English Tests for Spouses: ‘Benign Reform’ or ‘Social Engineering’?

A Supreme Court panel consisting of Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge looks set to hear Saffna Abdulla Mohammed Ali and Saiqa Bibi’s cases on 25 February 2015. These proceedings originated as a judicial review … Continue reading

Posted in Article 12, Article 14, Article 8, ECHR, English Tests, Immigration Rules, Proportionality, Spouses, UKSC | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Asylum and Sexual Orientation: Lost Opportunities in the CJEU

Joined Cases C-148/13 to C-150/13, A, B, C v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, UNHCR intervening, EU:C:2014:2406 (02 December 2014) As Lord Hope DPSC (as he then was) explained some years ago, the High Contracting Parties to the to the Convention … Continue reading

Posted in Asylum, CFR, CJEU, European Union, Netherlands | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment