Daily Archives: February 19, 2024

SSHD’s appeal on Bouchereau exception dismissed by Court of Appeal

Posted on February 19, 2024 by Asad Ali Khan, BA, MSc, MA, LL.B (Hons), LL.M

Secretary of State for the Home Department v Okafor [2024] EWCA Civ 23 (23 January 2024) The Court of Appeal has held that UT Judge Grubb’s decision to allow the appeal of Mr Okafor, a Nigerian citizen against the refusal … Continue reading →

Posted in Appeals, Court of Appeal, EUSS, Proportionality, Public Interest, Tribunals | Tagged Bouchereau exception, Court of Appeal, Directive 2004/38, European Union, Tribunals | Leave a comment

Court of Appeal: SSHD wins in child sex offences case

Posted on February 19, 2024 by Asad Ali Khan, BA, MSc, MA, LL.B (Hons), LL.M

Secretary of State for the Home Department v AA (Poland) [2024] EWCA Civ 18 (19 January 2024) The Court of Appeal has held that the FTT had erred in law in finding that the deportation of a foreign criminal who … Continue reading →

Posted in Article 8, Court of Appeal, Deportation, Poland, Proportionality, Sexual Offences, Tribunals, UKSC | Tagged Article 8, Case Law, Court of Appeal, Directive 2004/38, ECHR, Part5A NIAA, SHPO, UK Supreme Court | Leave a comment

Appendix FM and changes of £29,000 and £38,700 to MIR

Posted on February 19, 2024 by Asad Ali Khan, BA, MSc, MA, LL.B (Hons), LL.M

“MIR”, an acronym for “Minimum Income Requirement”, has become a menacing buzzword in the hostile world of UK immigration law which is required as annual income to sponsor a spouse. From 11 April 2024, MIR will be increased from £18,600 … Continue reading →

Posted in Appendix FM, Article 8, Immigration Rules, Spouses, UKSC | Tagged Appendix FM, Article 8, ECHR, Immigration Rules, UK Supreme Court | Leave a comment

Palestinian Guantánamo Bay detainee wins in Supreme Court

Posted on February 19, 2024 by Asad Ali Khan, BA, MSc, MA, LL.B (Hons), LL.M

Zubaydah v Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and others [2023] UKSC 50 (20 December 2023) Dismissing the Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office, the Home Office and the Attorney General’s appeal, the Supreme Court held in this case that under sections … Continue reading →

Posted in Appeals, Court of Appeal, False Imprisonment, Foreign law, Guantánamo Bay, Pakistan, PILA, Politics, Terrorism, UKSC | Tagged Court of Appeal, PILA, Rendition, Torture, UK Supreme Court | Leave a comment

Search for:
INSTRUCT ME
Subscribe for free

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address:

Join 1,805 other subscribers
- View asadakhan.104’s profile on Facebook
- View khanasada’s profile on Twitter
- View id=52295772&trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile’s profile on LinkedIn
- View Asad Khan’s profile on YouTube
Archives
Archives
Categories
Categories
Calendar
February 2024

M T W T F S S

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29

« Dec Mar »
UKVI News and Updates
- Guidance: Powers and operational procedure: caseworker guidance
- Visit the UK for medical treatment
- Guidance: Criminality guidance in article 8 ECHR cases: caseworker guidance
- Guidance: Prove your English language abilities with a secure English language test (SELT)
- Guidance: Register of licensed sponsors: workers
- Guidance: Register of licensed sponsors: students
- Guidance: Cases involving pending prosecution: caseworker guidance
- Guidance: Returns preparation: caseworker guidance
- Guidance: UKRI endorsement: endorsed funders (Global Talent visa)
- Guidance: UKRI endorsement: employing or hosting institutions (Global Talent visa)
Popular Tags
- 2004/38/EC
- Adoption
- Africa
- AP (Russia)
- Appeals
- Appendix FM
- Article 8
- Asylum
- Bangladesh
- BNA 1981
- Brexit
- British Citizenship
- British Nationality
- British Overseas Citizens
- Business
- Case Law
- Child Abduction
- Children
- Constitution
- Court of Appeal
- Criminal Offences
- Deception
- Dependants
- Detention
- DIsclosure
- Dual Nationality
- Dublin II
- ECHR
- Economy
- Entrepreneurs
- Entry Clearance
- European Union
- EUSS
- Fairness
- False Representations
- Fees
- Free Movement
- Habitual Residence
- Hague Convention
- Human Rights
- Human Trafficking
- ILR
- Immigration
- Immigration Cap
- Immigration Rules
- India
- Investors
- Iran
- Judicial Review
- Kenya
- Long Residence
- Marriage
- Migrant Workers
- Nigeria
- Overseas Workers
- Pakistan
- Pankina
- Part5A NIAA
- Persecution
- Points Based System
- Refugee Convention
- Removals
- Rule of law
- Russia
- Settlement
- SIAC
- Spouses
- Strasbourg
- Students
- Terrorism
- Tribunals
- UKBA
- UK Supreme Court
- Upper Tribunal
- Zambrano
Global Corporate Law
- Key Features of the Singapore Convention on Mediation
- What is the test for a ‘one man company’?
- LIBOR: The Final Nail in the Coffin?
- Banking and Misconduct: A Critique of the Cure of Culture
- Court of Appeal Opens the Door to LIBOR and Benchmark Misrepresentation Claims
- Habib Bank Expelled From New York
- Supreme Court: Equity’s Darling and Guidance on Enforceability of Trusts where the Institution is Unknown
- Conduct Costs on the Rise (2012-2016): No End in Sight
- Supreme Court Clarifies the Law on Security and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards
- FSMA and Third Party Rights: Victory for FCA in Supreme Court
Recent Posts
- False representations made in pending application don’t ‘simply disappear’ by varying it to an ILR application
- Home Office wins in Supreme Court against Belarusian man with “limbo” status
- Somali ILR holder stranded in Africa for 16 years succeeds in Cart judicial review in Court of Appeal
- Woman resident in the UK for 39 years loses deportation battle
- Failure to conduct statistical data monitoring on provision of accommodation to vulnerable PNMAS breaches PSED
- Court of Appeal disapproves of tribunal’s decision in Capparelli
- HC 590: Changes to MIR, Skilled Worker and other rules
- Appendix FM leave knocks out Zambrano right of residence
- Court of Appeal rejects invitation to treat EUSS family permit application as an EEA permit application
- Test of dishonesty in Ivey applies to deprivation decisions
Pages
- Case Law
- Editor
- Expert Reports
- Immigration Work
- Khan & Co Barristers
- Pakistan International Law
- Legal Advice
Search for:
Top Posts
- MLA without death penalty assurance breaches the DPA
- Procedural fairness fails entrepreneur in Court of Appeal
- British nationality claims: The Case of the East African Asians
- Court of Appeal on Nikah and non-qualifying ceremonies
- Pakistan and Child Abduction: Lahore High Court holds ‘Hague Convention is not an extradition treaty’
- Upper Tribunal: Tanveer Ahmed remains good law
- Lahore High Court ruling on forced conversion to Islam
- UK government’s inaction allows fraudulent Albanian to keep British citizenship
- Upper Tribunal: ‘Historic injustice’ v ‘historical injustice’
- Court of Appeal quashes Upper Tribunal’s article 8 decision in deception case
Immigration News
- Rwanda deportation law should not apply in Northern Ireland, court rules
- UK politics: government to appeal against ruling that blocks Rwanda deportations in Northern Ireland – as it happened
- Chelsea flower show hosts garden designed to help survivors of torture
- UK universities report drop in international students amid visa doubts
- ‘We had money! It was brilliant!’ Margaret Hodge on Labour governments, life as a migrant and quitting as an MP
- Child refugees using people smugglers to reach family in UK, report warns
- Rishi Sunak: UK is facing some of the most dangerous years in its history
- Starmer has laid out his plan to tackle asylum. Will it actually work? | Sunder Katwala
- ‘If Jacob Rees-Mogg wants to join us’ … Was Natalie Elphicke’s defection a step too far for Labour?
- Home Office faces legal challenge over risk of lone children being sent to Rwanda
Disclaimer

The analysis and commentary on the law on this weblog is provided free of charge for information purposes only. All reasonable steps are taken to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date at the date each item is published, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by its author. The pages, information, and commentary do not, and are not intended to, amount to providing legal advice to any person on any case or matter. You are strongly advised to obtain case specific, personal advice from a qualified lawyer about your case(s) or matter(s) and not to rely on the information or comments on this site for the purposes of your legal situation(s). This site is not associated with the UK Government or any other government for that matter. Please do not misconstrue anything herein to be connected to the Home Office or any other third party.
Top Posts & Pages
- MLA without death penalty assurance breaches the DPA
- Procedural fairness fails entrepreneur in Court of Appeal
- British nationality claims: The Case of the East African Asians
- Court of Appeal on Nikah and non-qualifying ceremonies
- Pakistan and Child Abduction: Lahore High Court holds ‘Hague Convention is not an extradition treaty’
- Upper Tribunal: Tanveer Ahmed remains good law
- Lahore High Court ruling on forced conversion to Islam
- UK government’s inaction allows fraudulent Albanian to keep British citizenship
- Upper Tribunal: ‘Historic injustice’ v ‘historical injustice’
- Court of Appeal quashes Upper Tribunal’s article 8 decision in deception case