Category Archives: Yarl’s Wood IRC

Home Office loses appeal in Ugandan LGBT asylum case

Posted on October 6, 2020 by Asad Ali Khan, BA, MSc, MA, LL.B (Hons), LL.M

PN (Uganda), R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 1213 (28 September 2020) The Court of Appeal has dismissed the SSHD’s appeal against Lewis J’s decision in PN v SSHD [2019] … Continue reading →

Posted in Access to Justice, Article 3, Asylum, Court of Appeal, ECHR, Human Trafficking, Judicial Review, Law Society, Persecution, Refugee Convention, Removals, Tribunals, UKSC, Yarl's Wood IRC | Tagged Asylum, Court of Appeal, Judicial Review, Refugee Convention, Tribunals | Leave a comment

High Court orders asylum-seeker’s return to pursue appeal

Posted on July 13, 2019 by Asad Ali Khan, BA, MSc, MA, LL.B (Hons), LL.M

PN (Uganda) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWHC 1616 (Admin) (24 June 2019) In these judicial review proceedings, brought by “PN”, Lewis J held that the dismissal of a Ugandan woman’s appeal against the refusal … Continue reading →

Posted in Africa, Article 3, Article 8, Asylum, Court of Appeal, Dyson JSC/MR, High Court, Judicial Review, Persecution, Refugee Convention, Tribunals, Uganda, Women, Yarl's Wood IRC | Tagged Asylum, Case Law, Judicial Review, Persecution, Refugee Convention, Tribunals | Leave a comment

Supreme Court on Detention, Deportation and Mental Illness

Posted on June 4, 2016 by Asad Ali Khan, BA, MSc, MA, LL.B (Hons), LL.M

R (O) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 19 (27 April 2016) Heaven knows: Yarl’s Wood IRC – the infamous British Gulag where pregnant women and children are locked up – may even make the likes … Continue reading →

Posted in Article 5, Asylum, Deportation, Detention, ECHR, European Union, Immigration Act 2016, Judicial Review, Legal Aid, Nigeria, UKSC, Yarl's Wood IRC | Tagged Asylum, Case Law, Detention, Judicial Review, Mental Illness, Removals, UK Supreme Court | 3 Comments

Please don’t deport Brenda Namigadde

Posted on January 30, 2011 by Asad Ali Khan, BA, MSc, MA, LL.B (Hons), LL.M

One would have to agree with the archbishop of Canterbury Dr Williams that the killing of Ugandan gay rights’s activist David Kato, who was murdered at his home in Mukono, Kampala after having won in court against a tabloid which … Continue reading →

Posted in Article 2, Article 5, Removals, Uganda, Uncategorized, Yarl's Wood IRC | Tagged Detention, ECHR, Removals, UKBA, Yarl's Wood IRC | Leave a comment

Search for:
INSTRUCT ME
Subscribe for free

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address:

Join 1,806 other subscribers
- View asadakhan.104’s profile on Facebook
- View khanasada’s profile on Twitter
- View id=52295772&trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile’s profile on LinkedIn
- View Asad Khan’s profile on YouTube
Archives
Archives
Categories
Categories
Calendar
April 2024

M T W T F S S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30

« Mar
UKVI News and Updates
- Guidance: Register of licensed sponsors: workers
- Guidance: Register of licensed sponsors: students
- Guidance: Immigration Health Surcharge: caseworker guidance
- Transparency data: Ukraine Visa Schemes: visa data
- Guidance: Immigration Rules archive: 11 March 2024 to 3 April 2024
- Guidance: Cambodia: tuberculosis test clinics for a UK visa
- Guidance: UK visa support for Ukrainian nationals
- Get access to your eVisa
- Promotional material: Online immigration status (eVisa): help video
- Guidance: Online immigration status (eVisa)
Popular Tags
- 2004/38/EC
- Adoption
- Africa
- AP (Russia)
- Appeals
- Appendix FM
- Article 8
- Asylum
- Bangladesh
- BNA 1981
- Brexit
- British Citizenship
- British Nationality
- British Overseas Citizens
- Business
- Case Law
- Child Abduction
- Children
- Constitution
- Court of Appeal
- Criminal Offences
- Deception
- Dependants
- Detention
- DIsclosure
- Dual Nationality
- Dublin II
- Dublin III
- ECHR
- Economy
- Entrepreneurs
- European Union
- EUSS
- Fairness
- False Representations
- Fees
- Free Movement
- Habitual Residence
- Hague Convention
- Human Rights
- Human Trafficking
- ILR
- Immigration
- Immigration Cap
- Immigration Rules
- India
- Investors
- Iran
- Judicial Review
- Kenya
- Long Residence
- Marriage
- Migrant Workers
- Nigeria
- Overseas Workers
- Pakistan
- Pankina
- Part5A NIAA
- Persecution
- Points Based System
- Refugee Convention
- Removals
- Rule of law
- Russia
- SIAC
- Spouses
- Strasbourg
- Students
- Syria
- Terrorism
- Tribunals
- UKBA
- UK Supreme Court
- Upper Tribunal
- Zambrano
Global Corporate Law
- Key Features of the Singapore Convention on Mediation
- What is the test for a ‘one man company’?
- LIBOR: The Final Nail in the Coffin?
- Banking and Misconduct: A Critique of the Cure of Culture
- Court of Appeal Opens the Door to LIBOR and Benchmark Misrepresentation Claims
- Habib Bank Expelled From New York
- Supreme Court: Equity’s Darling and Guidance on Enforceability of Trusts where the Institution is Unknown
- Conduct Costs on the Rise (2012-2016): No End in Sight
- Supreme Court Clarifies the Law on Security and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards
- FSMA and Third Party Rights: Victory for FCA in Supreme Court
Recent Posts
- Failure to conduct statistical data monitoring on provision of accommodation to vulnerable PNMAS breaches PSED
- Court of Appeal disapproves of tribunal’s decision in Capparelli
- HC 590: Changes to MIR, Skilled Worker and other rules
- Appendix FM leave knocks out Zambrano right of residence
- Court of Appeal rejects invitation to treat EUSS family permit application as an EEA permit application
- Test of dishonesty in Ivey applies to deprivation decisions
- Trafficking plea fails Shamima Begum in Court of Appeal
- Three year delay in making decision on application is lawful
- Court of Appeal: FTT failed to apply Iran country guidance to Kurdish asylum seeker’s case
- SSHD’s appeal on Bouchereau exception dismissed by Court of Appeal
Pages
- Case Law
- Editor
- Expert Reports
- Immigration Work
- Khan & Co Barristers
- Pakistan International Law
- Legal Advice
Search for:
Top Posts
- Upper Tribunal: Tanveer Ahmed remains good law
- Court of Appeal: Physical needs are decisive in ADR cases
- KO (Nigeria) judgment does not set out a ‘notional comparator’ baseline test
- Overstaying, flight side service and re-entry
- Court of Appeal holds that a ‘rolling review’ is acceptable
- British nationality claims: The Case of the East African Asians
- Court of Appeal on Nikah and non-qualifying ceremonies
- Khan & Co Barristers
- Pakistan and Child Abduction: Lahore High Court holds ‘Hague Convention is not an extradition treaty’
- Supreme Court: MIR is Lawful
Immigration News
- Rwanda bill: what does the latest delay mean?
- UK politics: Tory HQ resists calls to refer Menzies allegations to police – as it happened
- Rwanda bill further delayed after Lords again votes for changes
- Further delay to Rwanda bill’s passage as Lords vote through amendments – as it happened
- My friend, Anthony Williams, died too soon. What trauma are other Windrush survivors still going through? | Ramya Jaidev
- Asylum seekers moved out of ex-RAF site in Essex after safety risks found
- Sunak considering exemptions to Rwanda bill for some Afghans
- ‘Although I’m tetraplegic, I’ve started to feel normal’: Hanif Kureishi on staging The Buddha of Suburbia
- Rwanda bill delayed for at least a day after Lords pass amendments
- MPs vote to give smoking ban bill second reading – as it happened
Disclaimer

The analysis and commentary on the law on this weblog is provided free of charge for information purposes only. All reasonable steps are taken to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date at the date each item is published, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by its author. The pages, information, and commentary do not, and are not intended to, amount to providing legal advice to any person on any case or matter. You are strongly advised to obtain case specific, personal advice from a qualified lawyer about your case(s) or matter(s) and not to rely on the information or comments on this site for the purposes of your legal situation(s). This site is not associated with the UK Government or any other government for that matter. Please do not misconstrue anything herein to be connected to the Home Office or any other third party.
Top Posts & Pages
- Upper Tribunal: Tanveer Ahmed remains good law
- Court of Appeal: Physical needs are decisive in ADR cases
- KO (Nigeria) judgment does not set out a ‘notional comparator’ baseline test
- Overstaying, flight side service and re-entry
- Court of Appeal holds that a ‘rolling review’ is acceptable
- British nationality claims: The Case of the East African Asians
- Court of Appeal on Nikah and non-qualifying ceremonies
- Khan & Co Barristers
- Pakistan and Child Abduction: Lahore High Court holds ‘Hague Convention is not an extradition treaty’
- Supreme Court: MIR is Lawful