Daily Archives: September 15, 2014

Only the Civil Standard Applies in Demonstrating Citizenship

Posted on September 15, 2014 by Asad Ali Khan, BA, MSc, MA, LL.B (Hons), LL.M

Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 2968 (Admin) (12 September 2014) This is a noteworthy case, with roots in Pakistan, about the standard of proof to be applied by Her Majesty’s Passport Office (HMPO) with … Continue reading →

Posted in Bangladesh, Citizenship and Nationality, India, Judicial Review, Pakistan | Tagged Case Law, HMPO, Pakistan | Leave a comment

Search for:
INSTRUCT ME
Subscribe for free

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address:

Join 1,806 other subscribers
- View asadakhan.104’s profile on Facebook
- View khanasada’s profile on Twitter
- View id=52295772&trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile’s profile on LinkedIn
- View Asad Khan’s profile on YouTube
Archives
Archives
Categories
Categories
Calendar
September 2014

M T W T F S S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30

« Aug Oct »
UKVI News and Updates
- Guidance: Section 67 of the Immigration Act 2016 leave: caseworker guidance
- Guidance: China: tuberculosis test clinics for a UK visa
- Guidance: Register of licensed sponsors: workers
- Guidance: Register of licensed sponsors: students
- Form: Windrush Scheme application form (UK)
- Form: Windrush Compensation Scheme: claim forms and guidance
- Guidance: Windrush Compensation Scheme: caseworker guidance
- Guidance: PBS sponsor licensing – certificates: caseworker guidance
- Guidance: Asylum screening and routing: caseworker guidance
- Guidance: Prove your English language abilities with a secure English language test (SELT)
Popular Tags
- 2004/38/EC
- Adoption
- Africa
- AP (Russia)
- Appeals
- Appendix FM
- Article 8
- Asylum
- Bangladesh
- BNA 1981
- Brexit
- British Citizenship
- British Nationality
- British Overseas Citizens
- Business
- Case Law
- Child Abduction
- Children
- Constitution
- Court of Appeal
- Criminal Offences
- Deception
- Dependants
- Detention
- DIsclosure
- Dual Nationality
- Dublin II
- Dublin III
- ECHR
- Economy
- Entrepreneurs
- European Union
- EUSS
- Fairness
- False Representations
- Fees
- Free Movement
- Habitual Residence
- Hague Convention
- Human Rights
- Human Trafficking
- ILR
- Immigration
- Immigration Cap
- Immigration Rules
- India
- Investors
- Iran
- Judicial Review
- Kenya
- Long Residence
- Marriage
- Migrant Workers
- Nigeria
- Overseas Workers
- Pakistan
- Pankina
- Part5A NIAA
- Persecution
- Points Based System
- Refugee Convention
- Removals
- Rule of law
- Russia
- SIAC
- Spouses
- Strasbourg
- Students
- Syria
- Terrorism
- Tribunals
- UKBA
- UK Supreme Court
- Upper Tribunal
- Zambrano
Global Corporate Law
- Key Features of the Singapore Convention on Mediation
- What is the test for a ‘one man company’?
- LIBOR: The Final Nail in the Coffin?
- Banking and Misconduct: A Critique of the Cure of Culture
- Court of Appeal Opens the Door to LIBOR and Benchmark Misrepresentation Claims
- Habib Bank Expelled From New York
- Supreme Court: Equity’s Darling and Guidance on Enforceability of Trusts where the Institution is Unknown
- Conduct Costs on the Rise (2012-2016): No End in Sight
- Supreme Court Clarifies the Law on Security and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards
- FSMA and Third Party Rights: Victory for FCA in Supreme Court
Recent Posts
- Woman resident in the UK for 39 years loses deportation battle
- Failure to conduct statistical data monitoring on provision of accommodation to vulnerable PNMAS breaches PSED
- Court of Appeal disapproves of tribunal’s decision in Capparelli
- HC 590: Changes to MIR, Skilled Worker and other rules
- Appendix FM leave knocks out Zambrano right of residence
- Court of Appeal rejects invitation to treat EUSS family permit application as an EEA permit application
- Test of dishonesty in Ivey applies to deprivation decisions
- Trafficking plea fails Shamima Begum in Court of Appeal
- Three year delay in making decision on application is lawful
- Court of Appeal: FTT failed to apply Iran country guidance to Kurdish asylum seeker’s case
Pages
- Case Law
- Editor
- Expert Reports
- Immigration Work
- Khan & Co Barristers
- Pakistan International Law
- Legal Advice
Search for:
Top Posts
- Woman resident in the UK for 39 years loses deportation battle
- KO (Nigeria) judgment does not set out a ‘notional comparator’ baseline test
- Upper Tribunal: Tanveer Ahmed remains good law
- Court of Appeal reviews the meaning of “unduly harsh”
- Failure to conduct statistical data monitoring on provision of accommodation to vulnerable PNMAS breaches PSED
- Pakistan and Child Abduction: Lahore High Court holds ‘Hague Convention is not an extradition treaty’
- Mother of British child fails on Chikwamba and Zambrano
- Upper Tribunal: Guidance on mental health experts
- Court of Appeal: Substance not form grounds a family life
- US accepts Pakistan’s accession to the Hague Convention
Immigration News
- Humanitarian groups demand safe routes to UK after five deaths in Channel
- ‘England is hope’: some say they will try again – despite Channel deaths
- The Guardian view on sending refugees to Rwanda: the UN is right – this law sets a bad example | Editorial
- Braverman dropping Windrush measures was unlawful, court told
- Defence spending in UK to be put ‘on war footing’, Rishi Sunak says – as it happened
- Martin Rowson on Rishi Sunak’s Rwanda mission accomplished – cartoon
- Sunak ‘confident’ civil service will enact Rwanda bill despite legal concerns
- Rude, patronising and out of his depth, Minister Mikey ticks all the boxes | John Crace
- People attempt to cross Channel hours after passing of UK's Rwanda legislation – video
- Stumbling blocks that could still impede Rwanda deportations
Disclaimer

The analysis and commentary on the law on this weblog is provided free of charge for information purposes only. All reasonable steps are taken to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date at the date each item is published, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by its author. The pages, information, and commentary do not, and are not intended to, amount to providing legal advice to any person on any case or matter. You are strongly advised to obtain case specific, personal advice from a qualified lawyer about your case(s) or matter(s) and not to rely on the information or comments on this site for the purposes of your legal situation(s). This site is not associated with the UK Government or any other government for that matter. Please do not misconstrue anything herein to be connected to the Home Office or any other third party.
Top Posts & Pages
- Woman resident in the UK for 39 years loses deportation battle
- KO (Nigeria) judgment does not set out a ‘notional comparator’ baseline test
- Upper Tribunal: Tanveer Ahmed remains good law
- Court of Appeal reviews the meaning of “unduly harsh”
- Failure to conduct statistical data monitoring on provision of accommodation to vulnerable PNMAS breaches PSED
- Pakistan and Child Abduction: Lahore High Court holds ‘Hague Convention is not an extradition treaty’
- Mother of British child fails on Chikwamba and Zambrano
- Upper Tribunal: Guidance on mental health experts
- Court of Appeal: Substance not form grounds a family life
- US accepts Pakistan’s accession to the Hague Convention