Tag Archives: Article 8

Article 8 is Not a Box Ticking Exercise

Ahmed v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 300 (Admin) (14 February 2014) In this case Mr Justice Green held that it is important to avoid a “tick box” mentality in respect of article 8 of the … Continue reading

Posted in Appendix FM, Article 8, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Pakistan, Proportionality, Spouses | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

No More Freewheeling Article 8

Gulshan (Article 8 – new Rules – correct approach) Pakistan [2013] UKUT 640 (IAC) (17 December 2013) This case is about spouses and relocation. It is also about Karachi which is my hometown and Pakistan’s largest and most dangerous city. … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Immigration Rules, Pakistan, Spouses | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Welcome To The Jungle

Patel & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 72 (20 November 2013) It seems that the controversial jurisprudential saga of impenetrable jungle law has finally been settled. In unanimously dismissing these three appeals, the UK … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, ECHR, Immigration Rules, Pankina, Removals, UKSC | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Immigration Bill: Article 8 and Public Interest

The immigration bill has quite a lot to do with article 8 (right to respect for private and family life and one’s home and correspondence) of the European Convention on Human Rights. It is intended that the bill will speedily … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Automatic Deportation, Cases, Human Rights Act, Immigration Law, Removals | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

Vive la France!

B & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 2281 (Admin) Islam is in the news a lot. Muslims consider their faith to be a religion of tolerance but some of … Continue reading

Posted in Article 3, Article 8, Article 9, Asylum, Children, ECHR, Judicial Review, UKSC | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Interesting Judgment On Deporting EU Nationals

A B C v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1272 (Admin) (22 May 2013) This is yet another interesting and useful judgment by His Honour Judge Anthony Thornton QC. The decision involves the Immigration (European Economic … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Citizens Directive, CJEU, Court of Appeal, European Union, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

A Rather Cruel Piece Of Mockery: Part 2

MM, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1900 (Admin) (05 July 2013)  SSHD’s Case In light of Qulia, Chapti and Bibi, Blake J explained (at [86]) that the application of … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Immigration Rules, MAC, Proportionality, Spouses | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

A Rather Cruel Piece Of Mockery: Part 1

MM, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1900 (Admin) (05 July 2013) Much has been said about the controversial mandatory financial requirements – which almost half of the UK’s working … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Asylum, COA, Forced marriage, Judicial Review, Spouses | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Silence of the Rules

Green (Article 8 – new rules) Jamaica [2013] UKUT 254 (IAC) (13 May 2013) The speed with which the immigration rules are changed is overwhelming. Inevitably, many things are overlooked. This is an interesting case where the Upper Tribunal (UT) … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Cases, Crime, Immigration Rules, Tribunals | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Strike Three For New Rules: Part 1

Ogundimu (Article 8 – new rules) Nigeria [2013] UKUT 60 (IAC) (08 February 2013)  Nigeria – Africa’s most populous country – is spearheading the campaign against deportation and Ogundimu is the third case in a row where the judiciary has sent … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Crime, Human Rights Act, Nigeria, Settlement | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Tribunal Unimpressed With New Rules Again: Part 1

Izuazu (Article 8 – new rules) Nigeria [2013] UKUT 45 (IAC) (30 January 2013) Lately a plethora of immigration decisions have descended upon us. All this sensational case law makes awesome reading. But it is impossible to read it all. … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Cases, Immigration Rules, Nigeria, Proportionality, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The EU Dimension to Proportionality

Essa, R (On the Application Of) v Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1718 (21 December 2012) Deportation is a hugely controversial issue. Unsurprisingly, opinion on it remains utterly polarised. Journalists and lawyers alike have tried … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Citizens Directive, CJEU, Court of Appeal, European Union, Proportionality | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Can Third Country National Stepfathers Derive Rights Of Residence From Union Citizen Children?: Part 2

O & S v Maahanmuuttovirasto v L [2012] EUECJ C-356/11 (06 December 2012) This post analyses the rationale espoused by the CJEU in relation to its ruling which is highlighted in Can Third Country National Stepfathers Derive Rights Of Residence From … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, CFR, Children, CJEU, ECHR, Finland | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Immigration Rules Changed Again

Yet another set of changes in the immigration rules is around the corner and most of these will enter into force on 13 December 2012. To this end, Statement of changes in Immigration Rules HC 760 envisages a plethora of … Continue reading

Posted in Dependants, Immigration Rules, PBS, Settlement, UKBA 2007 | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The new rules: Article 8 and Judges

MF (Article 8 – new rules) Nigeria [2012] UKUT 393 (IAC) (31 October 2012) – see previous post for facts and background. Despite commenting positively [29] on some aspects of the new rules, the UT still thought that it “would be … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Automatic Deportation, CJEU, Human Rights Act, Immigration Rules, Proportionality, UKBA 2007 | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

New rules Not a Complete Code for Article 8

MF (Article 8 – new rules) Nigeria [2012] UKUT 393 (IAC) (31 October 2012) The Convention that emerged from the ashes of war to protect people’s freedoms should not have been made a target for a party’s political designs. This … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Automatic Deportation, Human Rights Act, Immigration Rules, Proportionality, Tribunals, UKBA 2007 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Spectres of Pankina: The Rules, Fairness and Article 8

Ferrer (limited appeal grounds; Alvi) Philippines [2012] UKUT 304 (IAC) (01 August 2012) This is a recent Upper Tribunal (“UT”, Judges Storey and Lane) case involving the Alvi [2012] UKSC 33 and Pankina [2010] EWCA Civ 719 genre of cases. The … Continue reading

Posted in Alvi, Article 8, Immigration Rules, Philippines, Sedley LJ, Tier 2, Work Permits | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Other Family Members: The Rationale

The last post had shed a little bit of light on the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) in relation to six questions which were referred to it by the Upper Tribunal (“UT”) in MR … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Cases, CFR, Citizens Directive, CJEU, ECHR, OFMs, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Article 8 and Polygamy

SG (child of polygamous marriage) Nepal [2012] UKUT 265 (IAC) (9 July 2012) The Upper Tribunal (“UT”, Justice Blake and Judge Dawson) has recently made it clear that in cases involving polygamy a child will not be able to join … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Blake J, Children, Immigration Rules, Settlement | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Article 8 and Kafka: Students under Chikwamba

Secretary of State for the Home Department v Hayat (Pakistan) [2012] EWCA Civ 1054 (31 July 2012) The question where an article 8 claim should be made often arises? At times this is a hard question to answer but the … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Court of Appeal, Immigration Rules, Pankina, PBS, Tier 4 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment