Category Archives: Proportionality

Advocate General Sharpston: Charter Constrains “Verifying” Asylum Claimants’ Sexual Orientation

In her recent Opinion in Joined Cases C-148/13, C149/13 and C-150/13, A, B and C, AG Sharpston agreed with the view that “an individual’s sexual orientation is a complex matter, entwined inseparably with his identity, that falls within the private … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Asylum, CFR, CJEU, Proportionality | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Article 8 is Not a Box Ticking Exercise

Ahmed v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 300 (Admin) (14 February 2014) In this case Mr Justice Green held that it is important to avoid a “tick box” mentality in respect of article 8 of the … Continue reading

Posted in Appendix FM, Article 8, Immigration Rules, Judicial Review, Pakistan, Proportionality, Spouses | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Citizens’ Directive: Imprisonment and Permanent Residence

Nnamdi Onuekwere v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EUECJ C-378/12 (03 October 2013) This post looks at Advocate General Yves Bot’s recent opinion on Directive 2004/38/EC and the right of permanent residence. The opinion “carries no legal … Continue reading

Posted in Citizens Directive, CJEU, European Union, Permanent Residence, Proportionality | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Court of Justice of the European Union on State Security, Notification of Decisions, Disclosure and Judicial Protection

Case C-300/11 ZZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department (4 June 2013) This is such an interesting case, which also involves Islam and the West, on Directive 2004/38/EC (the Directive). Some of the details in the Special Immigration … Continue reading

Posted in CFR, Citizens Directive, CJEU, Closed Evidence, Disclosure, European Union, Proportionality | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A Rather Cruel Piece Of Mockery: Part 2

MM, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1900 (Admin) (05 July 2013)  SSHD’s Case In light of Qulia, Chapti and Bibi, Blake J explained (at [86]) that the application of … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Immigration Rules, MAC, Proportionality, Spouses | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Strike Three For New Rules: Part 2

Ogundimu (Article 8 – new rules) Nigeria [2013] UKUT 60 (IAC) (08 February 2013) SSHD’s Case It was maintained that paragraph A362, part 13 (deportation), of the rules defeated O’s Article 8 claim and, even though the decision was made more … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Human Rights Act, Immigration Rules, Nigeria, Proportionality, Removals | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Tribunal Unimpressed With New Rules Again: Part 2

Izuazu (Article 8 – new rules) Nigeria [2013] UKUT 45 (IAC) (30 January 2013) The UT explained that the SSHD “overstates the significance of the rule change” and the effects of this change on Article 8 decision making where judges … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Children, European Union, Immigration Rules, Nigeria, Proportionality | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment