Category Archives: Immigration Rules

Fresh Claims and Freedom of Religion

ST v Secretary of State for Home Department [2012] EWHC 988 (Admin) (20 December 2012) Husayn ibn Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib, or Imam Husayn, was the grandson of the Prophet Muhammed (Peace Be Upon Him). Like the present predicament of … Continue reading

Posted in Article 9, Asylum, ECHR, Forced marriage, Immigration Rules, Pakistan | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Strike Three For New Rules: Part 2

Ogundimu (Article 8 – new rules) Nigeria [2013] UKUT 60 (IAC) (08 February 2013) SSHD’s Case It was maintained that paragraph A362, part 13 (deportation), of the rules defeated O’s Article 8 claim and, even though the decision was made more … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Human Rights Act, Immigration Rules, Nigeria, Proportionality, Removals | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Tribunal Unimpressed With New Rules Again: Part 2

Izuazu (Article 8 – new rules) Nigeria [2013] UKUT 45 (IAC) (30 January 2013) The UT explained that the SSHD “overstates the significance of the rule change” and the effects of this change on Article 8 decision making where judges … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Children, European Union, Immigration Rules, Nigeria, Proportionality | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tribunal Unimpressed With New Rules Again: Part 1

Izuazu (Article 8 – new rules) Nigeria [2013] UKUT 45 (IAC) (30 January 2013) Lately a plethora of immigration decisions have descended upon us. All this sensational case law makes awesome reading. But it is impossible to read it all. … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Cases, Immigration Rules, Nigeria, Proportionality, Tribunals | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

War On Students: It’s Not Cricket

Call him what you will (some people call him plain crazy), but on student immigration London’s cricket bat wielding/football kicking mayor Boris Johnson has got things dead right: “Against illegals, yes. Against talent, no. In football as in the economy … Continue reading

Posted in Economy, Immigration Rules, India, PBS, Students | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Immigration Rules Changed Again

Yet another set of changes in the immigration rules is around the corner and most of these will enter into force on 13 December 2012. To this end, Statement of changes in Immigration Rules HC 760 envisages a plethora of … Continue reading

Posted in Dependants, Immigration Rules, PBS, Settlement, UKBA 2007 | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The new rules: Article 8 and Judges

MF (Article 8 – new rules) Nigeria [2012] UKUT 393 (IAC) (31 October 2012) – see previous post for facts and background. Despite commenting positively [29] on some aspects of the new rules, the UT still thought that it “would be … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Automatic Deportation, CJEU, Human Rights Act, Immigration Rules, Proportionality, UKBA 2007 | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

New rules Not a Complete Code for Article 8

MF (Article 8 – new rules) Nigeria [2012] UKUT 393 (IAC) (31 October 2012) The Convention that emerged from the ashes of war to protect people’s freedoms should not have been made a target for a party’s political designs. This … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Automatic Deportation, Human Rights Act, Immigration Rules, Proportionality, Tribunals, UKBA 2007 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Spectres of Pankina: The Rules, Fairness and Article 8

Ferrer (limited appeal grounds; Alvi) Philippines [2012] UKUT 304 (IAC) (01 August 2012) This is a recent Upper Tribunal (“UT”, Judges Storey and Lane) case involving the Alvi [2012] UKSC 33 and Pankina [2010] EWCA Civ 719 genre of cases. The … Continue reading

Posted in Alvi, Article 8, Immigration Rules, Philippines, Sedley LJ, Tier 2, Work Permits | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Article 8 and Polygamy

SG (child of polygamous marriage) Nepal [2012] UKUT 265 (IAC) (9 July 2012) The Upper Tribunal (“UT”, Justice Blake and Judge Dawson) has recently made it clear that in cases involving polygamy a child will not be able to join … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Article 8, Blake J, Children, Immigration Rules, Settlement | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Article 8 and Kafka: Students under Chikwamba

Secretary of State for the Home Department v Hayat (Pakistan) [2012] EWCA Civ 1054 (31 July 2012) The question where an article 8 claim should be made often arises? At times this is a hard question to answer but the … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Court of Appeal, Immigration Rules, Pankina, PBS, Tier 4 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Alvi: The Aftermath …

In the wake of the Alvi [2012] UKSC 33 judgment, a new Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules CM8423  (“the statement”) came into force on 20 July 2012. Weirdly, the statement – spanning an overwhelming 288 pages – also corrects cross-referencing errors in Appendix … Continue reading

Posted in Alvi, Article 8, Dependants, Exceptional Talent, Immigration Rules, Tier 1, Tier 2 | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Alvi: Every “Rule” Must Be Laid

R (on the application of Alvi) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2012] UKSC 33 This case began as a “simple” Tier 2 (General) application under the points-based system (PBS). Yet the refusal of Mr Alvi’s application ended up … Continue reading

Posted in Court of Appeal, Immigration Rules, Pankina, PBS, Sedley LJ, Tier 2, UKSC | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Overstaying, flight side service and re-entry

The case of Singh (paragraph 320 (7A) – IS151A forms – proof) [2012] UKUT 00162 (IAC) is all about the cat and mouse charades which take place between the UK Border Agency and the subjects of immigration control. Moreover, the … Continue reading

Posted in Appeals, Domestic Workers, False Statements, Heathrow, Immigration Rules, Notices, Removals, Tier 1, WHM | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Family Migration and Article 8′s New Dress

Theresa May’s rabid immigration policies are no secret and the government is changing the Immigration Rules yet again. It is the eighteenth statement of changes in the Immigration Rules to be announced by the Home Office since the present government … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Dependants, Immigration Rules, Judges, Proportionality, Settlement | Tagged , , , , , | 7 Comments

Historic Injustice and Proportionality

Ghising (family life – adults – Gurkha policy) Nepal [2012] UKUT 160 (IAC) In this case the Upper tribunal said that “the ambit of Article 8 is not circumscribed” and in reducing the importance normally attached to immigration control the … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Court of Appeal, East African Asians, Gurkhas, Immigration Rules, Proportionality, Settlement | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Case Preview: Alvi and Munir in Supreme Court

The latest post on Alvi is available here. For the impact of Alvi on the Immigration Rules see post here. The latest post on Rahman, Munir and DP 5/96 is available here. Original post continues below. Writing last week on the … Continue reading

Posted in Article 8, Cases, Immigration Rules, Pankina, PBS, Sedley LJ, Settlement | Tagged , , , , , | 13 Comments

Statistiken, Gastarbeiter und Wirtschaft

A week ago the Office for National Statistics published its Migration Statistics Quarterly Report February 2012. The summary included the following points: Estimated total long-term immigration to the UK in the year to June 2011 was 593,000. This compares to 582,000 in … Continue reading

Posted in Business, Economy, Immigration Rules, PBS, Settlement | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Students, cancellation, curtailment and private life

Fiaz (cancellation of leave to remain – fairness) Pakistan [2012] UKUT 57 (IAC) (22 February 2012) Facts Having one’s leave/visa curtailed is quite a serious matter but to have it cancelled is a lot worse. In this case the appellant … Continue reading

Posted in Arrivals, Article 8, Blake J, ECHR, False Statements and Misrepresentations, Immigration Rules, Pakistan, PBS, Students | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

April changes to points-based system

The Immigration Rules are changed all the time. No part of the rules has been varied as much as the points-based system (PBS). The purpose of the PBS was to harmonise the old rules which brought about its creation. Yet, … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration Rules, PBS, Post Study Work, Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 4 | Tagged , , | 3 Comments