Economics of the Post Study Work visa


British Library of Political and Economic Science, LSE

British educational institutions such as the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) are resisting the government’s plans to delete the PSW visa category from the immigration rules. It has been acknowledged by the Immigration Minister Mr Damian Green that Britain’s educational institutions, such as the LSE, constitute a pivotal part of the economy. Income generated from the educational sector amounts to over £5 billion annually and providers of reputed professional and academic courses in the UK have warned that the government’s plans to curtail the rights of students to work in the UK spell doom for the educational sector.

The potential damage to the UK will be twofold. Firstly, educational institutions will have to lay-off a large proportion of their teaching staff because international demand for courses in the UK will diminish. Moreover, since fewer overseas students will pursue their studies in the UK, less revenue in fees will be collected by the educational sector. These two whammies compound British academic institutions’ existing problem of fewer applications by home students in response to the government’s increase in home fees.

Ultimately, for Britain, ostensibly minute changes to the immigration rules based on irrationality will mean less national income and more unemployment. Moreover, it will take years to reverse the damage done to the UK’s image and reputation (built over the centuries) as a country which is at the apex of providing professional training, research and the transmission academic knowledge.

The LSE’s Academic Registrar Simeon Underwood has made no secret of the school’s views in relation to the Cameron government’s immigration policy. For the LSE, the changes in the immigration rules “are driven by fear” which is “a response to xenophobic attitudes in some parts of British society.”

For the LSE the deletion, or even amendment, of the PSW route is inherently problematic because 41 per cent of the school’s undergraduates and 59 per cent of the graduates can be classified as “international students”. Moreover, 30 per cent of the LSE’s fee revenue is derived from students who are subject to immigration control. Therefore, the school estimates that a strident immigration policy in relation to the PSW route will be more harmful to the school’s enrolment than the increase in tuition fees. The two taken together will administer a near fatal blow to the LSE’s vast global appeal. The school reported that 56 per cent of its international students had considered the PSW visa to be a decisive in committing to study at the LSE.

Thus, for the LSE the axing of the PSW visa amounts to losing “out on the best and the brightest by letting this draconian proposal become law.” The school also added that the PSW route was vital “to attracting top-notch applicants from developed and developing countries alike.” In sum, LSE takes the view that the government’s policy is a retrograde step in the United Kingdom’s immigration policy and Underwood, the LSE’s registrar, gave the Australian example of Monash University which had to sack 300 members of its academic staff when that country amended its post study visa rules. Underwood added that:

The damages will probably be greater among Britain’s top universities because it is often the high-flying students who are making conscious choices on whether to come here, or go to the States or Australia.

Wonder what George Bernard Shaw and the Webbs would make of the above?

(The author obtained an MSc in Anthropology and Development from the LSE in 2001. He was also granted a PSW visa on the strength of his LLB (Hons) degree from the College of Law which he was awarded in 2007. He also holds an American BA degree and would like, for the first time, to agree with the LSE. His resume is available here.)

About mkp

Advocate High Courts of Pakistan
This entry was posted in AP (Russia), Article 8, Employment, Immigration Rules, Post Study Work, Tier 1 and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Economics of the Post Study Work visa

  1. Athar says:

    The new immigration policy is unbelievable and discourages education and research in this country. The people who want to come to uk will go to europe and easily get immigration there through different routes and again they will come to UK. Second claim of asylm will be increased. The result net immigration will be uneffected. And the number of useful citizens
    to society and economy will go down. The standard of universities in many developing countries increasing. So what will happen in future that people will prefer to study to from abroad. The universities in UK will be seriously effected with existing policies. To run a University two financial sources are essential. No1 govt. support which is already reduced No2 tuition fee which will be effected by immigration rule and rise in local fee.
    Building repute take centuries and ruining will be done only in five years with existing policies.

  2. Jack says:

    This will affect the reputation of UK as slandered hub of research and education. But this is for safety measures. I hope they will consider it soon and will find some way out so that the immigrants can feel OK there. This definitely need to be reviewed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s